—According to UCLA Law School: "UCLA School of Law's Clinical Program, working together with Sanjukta M. Paul, a civil rights attorney with the firm Rothner, Segall, Greenstone & Leheny, secured a victory for catering food truck operators in a case challenging the constitutionality of a city ordinance that has been aggressively implemented against these vendors in Los Angeles since the beginning of 2008. On Friday, Los Angeles Superior Court Commissioner Barry D. Kohn ruled on appeal that the ordinance, which required catering trucks to move every 30 or 60 minutes to a distant location and not vend for 30 to 60 minutes, is not rationally related to public safety or public health and is preempted by the California Vehicle Code."
—Justice has also come for Cap'n Crunch. According to California Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, "A judge has tossed a lawsuit filed by a San Diego woman against the manufacturers of Cap'n Crunch's Crunch Berries cereal for leading her to believe that the crunch berries were real fruit, but she is appealing."
—"Can you trademark a chocolate bunny?" WSJ.
—Pringles are potato chips. "Britain’s Supreme Court of Judicature ruled with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and against Procter & Gamble U.K....The ruling means that Proctor & Gamble owes $160 million in taxes." Jonathan Turley.