Okay, perhaps some readers will think this blog is obsessed with the Chem-ster. But, you just can't beat the legal news that surrounds the UCI law school dean. The dean has now chellenged a US Court of Appeals judge to a debate.
In recent weeks, Judge Dennis Jacobs, 2d US Court of Appeals, has made some rather indelicate remarks on the nature of pro bono legal service. His statement was one of those tell-us-what-you-really-think-Judge-Jacobs statements. Essentially, he concludes that attorneys who serve underprivileged clients bro bono are only doing so to improve their personal status, to improve the status of their law firms and that these attorneys and law firms are just self-serving and anti-social.
The events wen't kinda like this: 1. Jacobs releases racy statement, 2. Chemerinsky issues spirited public response disagreeing with Jacobs, 3. Jacobs clarifies with the WSJ law blog and, 4. Chemerinksy challenges Jacobs to a debate.
That's right, Chemerinsky, faster than a speeding con law genius, able
to dean law schools in a single bound, is now an outspoken pro bono
advocate.
If the debate does take place, the Federalist Society and the American Constitutional Society may co-sponsor the debate. Judge Jacobs is now in the interesting place of taking the challenge and defending a difficult position or ignoring the debate and essentially conceding.
More at the ABA Journal.
Recent Comments