The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal, et al. (08-22) concerned whether a judge who accepted $3 million in campaign contributions from a defendant should recuse himself. the Blog of Legal Times reports "In his forceful dissent Monday in the Caperton v. Massey Coal Co. case, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. cited the 1989 case of U.S. v. Halper, which was Roberts' first oral argument before the high court, assigned to him by his mentor Chief Justice William Rehnquist." and Jonathan Turley reports: "A divided court voted 5-4 in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal, et al. (08-22) that West Virginia Justice Brent D. Benjmain violated the constitution by sitting on a case involving the major donor in his campaign, A.T. Massey's chief executive, Don Blankenship."

